| Nr.: 191 Name: Natashalep | 29.01.2012 - 04:22:36 |      |
Ich will zum Download xrumer 7.0.10 ELITE?
Gib mir bitte URL! |
| Nr.: 190 Name: Mariah_Iowa | 17.01.2012 - 21:52:55 |  |
| Honestly said, I don\'t think you can do anything to fend off the attacks. I don\'t think you got attacked because of something you did, but because lots of people admire you and your work. That\'s apparently enough for some people to hate you. Only by unpassionating your readers, can you hope to actually stop the haters. I hope you will reject that option. |
| Nr.: 189 Name: Eva_Kentucky | 17.01.2012 - 15:42:17 | |
| One condition would be that the groupblog would adopt your style. Similar to how the headfirst books have the same style but different writers. If you join the 37signals blog where you put up highly visual articles, in a see of more textual posts, you will still stand out. |
| Nr.: 188 Name: Julia_South_Dakota | 17.01.2012 - 07:29:48 | |
| Take me for example. I could support Bachman, Cain, Palin, or Santorum. in no particular order. Others would choose fewer plus Paul. |
| Nr.: 187 Name: Anna_South_Carolina | 17.01.2012 - 06:21:49 | |
Use your passion and geek expertise to liberate the latent creativity that resides in readers, something that works better than the linear, sequential and fast fading stream of comments (yeah, this is recursive). Comments are writing, but lets have something not as we know it. Writing in this box just feel a little klunky, there must be a better way, make a better blog  |
| Nr.: 186 Name: Maria_Oregon | 15.01.2012 - 06:07:11 | |
| Having said all of that, I wonder if Ande\'s idea isn\'t the best (regardless of what format you choose to go with for the blog). If it was still public with no comments, but you cross-posted entries in a private forum, you could allow people to respond and discuss in a controlled/private environment, but still keep the blog itself public. I\'m not sure how much extra work that would be for you, but if it was negligible I would say that\'s the best option for running your site the way you have and seem to love, but keeping the riffraff at bay. |
| Nr.: 185 Name: Brooklyn_Minnesota | 14.01.2012 - 19:35:04 | |
| I always wondered if the Manchurian Candidate – McLame – would make an appearance. I think he is a victim of Stockholm Syndrome, too. |
| Nr.: 184 Name: Natalie_Ohio | 12.01.2012 - 05:20:34 | |
| I do think that by working in a team, it will make it easier for you. The passion moves away from you and to the team of writers, the hate will move with it. Being a part of a groupblog would be a good solution. |
| Nr.: 183 Name: Nevaeh_New_York | 11.01.2012 - 18:47:28 | |
| I understand. That is why I made the point about the state caucus to come up with acceptable Presidential candidates. My fear is we have too many conservatives that may split our vote and let a Romney, Christie get in. |
| Nr.: 182 Name: Riley_Massachusetts | 09.01.2012 - 05:22:59 | |
| I’m not sure what you have against “The Five”. I mean, four of the five panel members are on the right. The only creep is Bob Beckel. I admit, his creepiness makes the show a bit harder to handle. But Greg Gutfeld makes up for it! I LOVE him!! Beckel will probably have a stroke or a heart attack on the show one day and they can just shove him off the stage and continue on. |
Vorherige | Weitere
|